>> [MUSIC] My name is
Charles. In this video,
I'm going to show you how to
use conditional breakpoints
to focus on the data and
values that actually matter.
That way, you can debug
smarter and fix bugs faster.
More often than not, your games
most crucial features are
the ones that present the
biggest debugging challenges.
Take this project, for example.
Spawning is one of its key mechanics
and I've tried to
improve that by writing
code that changes the SpawnRate in
response to the player's skill level.
The idea is that enemy
should spawn faster
when the player is doing well
and slower when the
player is lagging behind.
To achieve this, my logic
modifies an animation curve
that represents enemy
SpawnRate over time.
Here, the x-axis represents time
and the y-axis represents SpawnRate.
This graph represents a
linear progression in
which enemies will spawn
faster as time progresses.
However, that's just a
static, hard-coded example.
In reality, our graph will
fluctuate as the player plays
and there's no telling what it will
actually look like at runtime.
If it's working as expected,
the players should be
met with a challenging
yet manageable flow of enemies.
However, somehow I've
introduced a bug that causes
the SpawnRate animation
curve to fall below zero,
which results in a ton of
enemies being spawned.
That's no fun for the player
and especially no fun for me,
the developer who now
has to figure out
what in the world has gone wrong.
Looking at the code
that's responsible
for updating the animation curve,
we can see that it uses
an algorithm that applies
some modifiers to a
configurable base SpawnRate.
The key modifier here is
the difficulty modifier,
which is used to increase the
time in-between each spawn.
This is really good
information to work with,
but I'm not really sure where
to begin my debugging process.
The problem is that algorithms
are not my strong point
and I have no idea
what could be causing
the SpawnRate to spin so
wildly out of control.
I'll need to do some debugging.
Now, the standard approach is
to use debug.log statements
to get more information
about what's happening.
However, in this case,
we've got a lot of noises,
there's just too much
happening in the scene.
We could add some logic
to make our logging a
little more intelligent,
but then we just have a
bunch of debug code peppered
throughout our logic
and no one wants to maintain that.
Instead, we're going
to use a feature of
the Visual Studio
debugger that'll help us
quickly get more information
without all of this extra code.
Let's start by adding
a normal breakpoint on
the line right after
SpawnRate gets assigned.
Then let's attach
Visual Studio to Unity.
Perfect.
Now, switch back to
Unity and hit "Play".
This will cause the debugger
to immediately cause
the execution of our code on our
breakpoint just as expected.
Now that's helpful
because as we've covered
in our other videos about debugging,
we'll be able to inspect any
and all variables that
are currently in SQL.
But I'm not really interested in
inspecting those variables just yet.
At this point in our games lifecycle,
SpawnRate is being set
to a reasonable value,
it's working exactly
as I expect it to.
While I could poke around,
I don't know if I'd be able to
discern anything of importance.
What I really care about
is inspecting the code
when the bug occurs and
only when the bug occurs.
That's where conditional
breakpoints come in.
Conditional breakpoints
are a feature of
the Visual Studio debugger.
They allow you to pause
the execution of your code
when certain conditions
have been met.
This can give us a great deal of
additional control over
our debugging process.
Let's see it in action.
Back in Visual Studio.
Let's modify our existing
breakpoints so it pauses execution
when SpawnRate dips below
a certain threshold.
For example, a threshold that
we deemed to be unacceptable
or too dangerous for the player.
To do that, all we have to do is
right-click on the breakpoint
and then select "Conditions"
from the context menu.
This will present a breakpoint
settings block that appears
just below the line on which
the breakpoint is set.
From here, we have a couple
of options to choose from.
Let's expand the first drop down.
Our options are conditional
expression, hit count, and filter.
Conditional expressions represent
any logical condition
that you can think of,
so long as the values you
reference are in scope.
When using conditional expressions,
the breakpoint will be
triggered when your expression
has been satisfied or when
a value has been changed.
For example, I can
reference SpawnRate so that
execution pauses whenever
its value changes.
Hit count triggers your
break point whenever
the line has been executed
a certain amount of times.
This is great for loops that you
suspect have gotten out of control
and are iterating more
times than they should.
Finally, the filter option
triggers your break point
when specific low-level
conditions have been met.
There are a number of
predefined filters available,
such as machine name, process ID,
and thread name that
you can use to restrict
your breakpoints to select
devices, processes, or threads.
In our case, we don't need
anything complicated.
We'll just use a
conditional expression.
Since something is
causing the spawner
to spawn enemies way too quickly,
I suspect that SpawnRate is being
set to a ridiculously small number.
Let's confirm that suspicion by
adding a condition that triggers
the breakpoint when the value
of SpawnRate drops below 0.5,
then we can examine the other values
and try to determine what's going on.
This condition is possible
because SpawnRate
is in the same scope
as the breakpoint.
You may recall from
our debugging basics
video that you should
take care to add
breakpoints to the lines
of code for all of
the variables you want to
inspect are accessible.
In our case, SpawnRate is
a variable that's local
to the function where our
breakpoint is currently placed.
So we're good to go.
Let's play the scene until
our breakpoint is triggered.
[MUSIC].
Great. Our conditional
breakpoint worked.
The execution of our code
is pause at the point
where SpawnRate has reached
an unexpected value.
Now we can figure
out what's going on.
Again, I'm terrible with algorithms.
Hopefully, the solution
will be simple.
Let's analyze each variable
that's used in our dynamic
SpawnRate algorithm.
Base SpawnRate is a field that
can be set in the inspector.
It represents the base
SpawnRate of the spawner.
It should be set to a moderate value,
which it looks like it is.
Next, spawn enemies is an instance of
a scriptable object that
holds a list of game objects.
Here we're adding the count
to the base SpawnRate
in order to increase the
time between each spawn.
That way, the game becomes easier
when there are more
enemies in the scene.
Moving on, difficulty
modifier is another field
that can be set in the inspector.
Its job is to tune down the impact
that enemy count has
on the base SpawnRate.
The lower the value, the
harder the difficulty.
In this case, it looks
like it's way too low.
In fact, a negative value should
not be allowed here at all.
This is a common problem that happens
when you expose
properties in the editor,
especially when those properties have
an effect on your
games key algorithms.
Users will always
find a way to provide
values that fundamentally
break your logic.
That being said, being able to
parameterize your component
is extremely important
because you want to be able
to hand off tasks like
tuning difficulty to game
designers wherever possible.
Instead of restricting this
property to fix the bug,
we're going to make a
couple of quick changes
to guard against bad user input.
The first is the range attribute.
Range is a Unity specific
attribute that limits
the value of a property in the
editor to a predefined range.
Let's limit difficulty modifier
to a value between 0.1 and 1.
Perfect. Now, our game designer
won't be able to input
a game breaking value.
That's a great start, but we
still need one more check.
A dynamic SpawnRate algorithm
partially depends on elapsed time.
That means that given enough time,
SpawnRate will eventually dip
down into an unacceptable range.
Luckily for us, the
solution is as simple as
clamping SpawnRate between
two acceptable values.
This will allow us to provide
minimum and maximum values.
That's it, our game
is back to normal.
More importantly, we've limited
the ability for our game designer
or anyone else who modifies
the spawner component
to break our logic.
It was all thanks to
conditional breakpoints
in the Visual Studio debugger.
Without them, we either have to sift
through tons of log statements
or manually pause and continue
the execution of our code until
we reach the broken state.
Conditional breakpoints gave
us the ability to place
a breakpoint that pause
only when we needed it to,
which helps us close
our feedback loop
and dramatically speed up
our debugging workflow.
Best of all, it works the same way
across all Visual Studio products.
Whether you're using Visual Studio
for Mac or Visual Studio code,
be sure to take advantage of these
powerful time-saving features.
[MUSIC]
Wednesday, February 4, 2026
Conditional Breakpoints [4 of 5] Beginner’s Series to Visual Studio Tooling for Unity Developers
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

No comments:
Post a Comment